http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-11
13:45:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23628
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23628
gcc46-pr48044.patch
This fixed it and passed bootstrap/regtest.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-11
14:47:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 11 14:47:26 2011
New Revision: 170873
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170873
Log:
PR middle-end/48044
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
09:36:12 UTC ---
c's vnode is first varpool_mark_needed_node, then it is again marked as not
needed by cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes (so far both for -O0 and -O1+)
and as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-03-10 12:51:19 UTC
---
I wonder if cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes shouldn't be somehow alias pairs
aware (can it e.g. call find_aliases_1 again?), or at least for !optimize
shouldn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-linux
