[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

2014-10-11 Thread ibuclaw at ubuntu dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

2014-03-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Java. Even with the removal of the Java source compiler (the byte code one should be safe enough).

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

2014-03-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Java.

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

2013-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- What front-end requires flag_evaluation_order now?

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

2011-03-12 Thread ibuclaw at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23639|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

2011-03-12 Thread ibuclaw at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2011-03-12 22:52:59 UTC --- Created attachment 23639 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23639 diff for 48099