http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-27
09:35:38 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk? Still broken on the branch? Does backporting the patch
help there?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16
09:02:38 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Oct 16 09:02:33 2011
New Revision: 180053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180053
Log:
PR target/48668
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.6.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05
15:30:32 UTC ---
Hi,
I am not 100% I understand the problem. For 4.6 we indeed probably should go
with reverting to prevous order.
We are trying to output both the function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18 17:02:32 UTC
---
Created attachment 24037
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24037
assembler output before and after the culprit patch
