http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19
15:50:04 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 19 15:50:00 2011
New Revision: 180194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180194
Log:
PR debug/49310
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-07-04 18:57:45 UTC ---
patch ;-)
Index: gcc/params.def
===
--- gcc/params.def (revision 175820)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-09 06:54:33 UTC ---
two more datapoints (depth=30 is still running):
max-vartrack-expr-depth=22: var-tracking emit :5459.44 (99%) usr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-08 07:16:06 UTC ---
the testcase from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20290
can be used more conveniently. It runs in 1.4s and still spends 50%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-08 13:23:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Using -g -O2 -fbounds-check instead of -g -O1 -fbounds-check cures it,
or e.g. -g -O1 -fbounds-check --param
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-08
13:34:42 UTC ---
10 was the minimal value to get reasonable debug info in some cases (e.g.
gcc.dg/guality/), so perhaps 20 is too much and we should go down to the
default of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-08
13:38:51 UTC ---
Or alternatively make it more dynamic, like if in one function the maximum
level is reached or almost reached (so it could be checked only in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] Compile
10 matches
Mail list logo