http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-03
14:32:01 UTC ---
> and we have a CTOR and not individual initializations because of Erics
> const-pool changes I believe.
No, we have the constructor with GCC 4.5 as well, my patch only makes it go
th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-02 13:36:20 UTC ---
I don't think there's any particular reason this initializer should need
to be folded in a particular way by the front end; I'd think the front
end's job is to produc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
Status|U
