http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
12:10:13 UTC ---
That said, please pick one fail and investigate a bit. ppc-darwin doesn't
seem to be STRICT_ALIGNMENT.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-09-14
07:20:14 UTC ---
I've looked into the 22_locale/money_get/get/char/13.cc failure.
The problem is a miscompilation of locale-inst.cc in libstdc++.
Source:
template
_InIter
money_get<_CharT,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-09-14
08:41:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 25270
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25270
Experimental fix
On S/390 all the failures disappear with that patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-14
12:42:06 UTC ---
> Created attachment 25270 [details]
> Experimental fix
I'll test the patch on ppc-darwin9, but it will take some time on my slow
machine. Meanwhile do you understand why the t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-16
14:41:19 UTC ---
I have done a clean bootstrap of powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 with the patch in comment #5 with all languages except
go.
I have posted the results of the te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-11-16
09:27:59 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Nov 16 09:27:56 2011
New Revision: 181405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181405
Log:
2011-11-16 Andreas Krebbel
PR middle-e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390x-ibm-linux |s390x-ibm-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-17
14:02:47 UTC ---
The comment for the new code show the error in logic:
/* If the remaining chunk doesn't have full wordsize we have
to make sure that for big endian machines t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-11-17
15:23:26 UTC ---
As the tests from Ian Sandoe and Dominique d'Humieres show, the Darwin/AIX
regressions disappear when limiting the extract_bit_field invocation to
fieldmode == BLKmode (as it was in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-11-17 16:33:59 UTC ---
> As the tests from Ian Sandoe and Dominique d'Humieres show, the Darwin/AIX
> regressions disappear when limiting the extract_bit_field invocation to
> fieldmode == BLKmode (a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-19 14:56:09
UTC ---
I had a quick look...
actually, I suspect that the BLKmode constraint you originally had is, in fact,
correct.
we are talking about bit fields - i.e contiguous blocks of bits - so, if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oleg.e...@t-online.de
--- Comment #19 from Ol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-21 08:08:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Patch also break mips-linux-gnu. See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02004.html
I applied this on top of r181530 and reg-strapped on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #21 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 21:50:46 UTC ---
Author: davem
Date: Mon Nov 21 21:50:41 2011
New Revision: 181598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181598
Log:
Revert regression causing changes to stor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-01 09:22:19 UTC ---
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
>
> --- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-11-17
> 15:23:2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe 2011-12-01 10:10:10
UTC ---
there is nothing in the ABI doc:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/LowLevelABI/100-32-bit_PowerPC_Function_Calling_Conventions/32bitPowerP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe 2011-12-01 10:25:33
UTC ---
well.. sorry, that might be a bogus comment
- it depends on whether the following can be interpreted to allow a different
layout on the stack from 'normal' memory.
Since the embedding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe 2011-12-01 11:08:28
UTC ---
the following tried using the vendor's gcc-4.2:
typedef struct
{
unsigned short flda:9;
float b;
unsigned int fldc:17;
float d;
unsigned long long flde:33;
float f;
} Struc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-01 11:23:41 UTC ---
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
>
> --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe 2011-12-01
> 10:10:10 UTC -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-08 13:00:10 UTC ---
Note that reapplying r181405 with the Richard Sandiford's patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02004.html fixes the failures on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 without v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #28 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-08
17:26:03 UTC ---
> Note that reapplying r181405 with the Richard Sandiford's patch at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02004.html fixes the failures on
> powerpc-apple-darwin9 without vi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25270|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #30 from David Edelsohn 2012-01-16
16:58:14 UTC ---
I tested the attachment patch on AIX. The results are in the testresults
posted this morning. No regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 21:07:50 UTC ---
For the record, I'm still a little uncomfortable with this.
It feels too much like a hack to me. Eric knows this stuff
much better than I do though, so if he's happy, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-16
21:53:42 UTC ---
> For the record, I'm still a little uncomfortable with this.
> It feels too much like a hack to me. Eric knows this stuff
> much better than I do though, so if he's happy, I'll cede
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #33
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-16
22:20:52 UTC ---
> Please avoid the first hunk in #c29 patch though, it has wrong formatting and
> it isn't clear why is that line being changed at all.
Yes, this hunk is to be dropped.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-17
11:12:43 UTC ---
So, Richard, are you going to commit it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #36 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 11:43:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> So, Richard, are you going to commit it?
I'd prefer it if someone else did TBH.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #37 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 20:37:58 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jan 17 20:37:46 2012
New Revision: 183262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183262
Log:
gcc/
2012-01-17 Andreas Krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #39 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #40
41 matches
Mail list logo
