http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-06
09:25:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 6 09:25:46 2012
New Revision: 189314
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189314
Log:
2012-07-06 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-29
08:27:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 29 08:27:04 2012
New Revision: 185951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185951
Log:
2012-03-29 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||borut.razem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-10-30
20:35:03 UTC ---
The regression started with r158372:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00478.html
Here's what seems to have happened:
1. Anatoly Sokolov suggested to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-10-29
14:28:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I haven't been able to reproduce the loop on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi with
any of 4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7.
arm eabi targets force 64bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-10-29
01:16:37 UTC ---
My large testcase reduced to:
void
foo ()
{
unsigned int a = 1 0x8000;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
12 matches
Mail list logo