https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18
09:41:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
I can't add an attribute to the system isnan from my user code, or can I?
I've
never been quite sure what Paolo was referring
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #34 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18
10:03:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
To be honest, this bug report is not under any discussion anymore. I tried to
get any sort of sanity, but in the end it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #35 from Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com 2011-10-18
21:09:07 UTC ---
Thanks all for the info!
I should have realized there was literally an attribute/pragma called
'optimize' (duh), and it's already in the docs... for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
21:21:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
So then there are a variety of potential solutions to evaluate:
A) Don't use the builtin, go back to __isnan, perhaps only when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #31 from Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com 2011-10-18
00:33:41 UTC ---
I don't see what the hurry is to close the bug while it's still under
discussion. I guess you guys just like hit that 'resolved' button before
you've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #32 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 01:33:10
UTC ---
To be honest, this bug report is not under any discussion anymore. I tried to
get any sort of sanity, but in the end it's all about egos; you won't
get what
16 matches
Mail list logo