http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
19:25:56 UTC ---
This kind of changes are not interesting (and I doubt anyone will investigate).
Interesting are code changes that make a difference in performance.
Btw,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
--- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-11-18 01:41:04 UTC
---
Created attachment 25850
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25850
pre-procecessed source that produces better-performing code with two iterations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
--- Comment #4 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-11-18 01:43:32 UTC
---
Ah, okay. I read in your email you were looking for evidence of bugs, and the
behaviour looked fishy to me. Regardless, here is a performance improvement
that