http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
15:15:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 26659
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26659
proposed patch
Actually Richard (rth), the restriction is less strict than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
17:50:02 UTC ---
The patch in #c4 looks good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-15
00:29:10 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Feb 15 00:29:06 2012
New Revision: 184251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184251
Log:
+ PR middle-end/52142
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
17:53:14 UTC ---
We were *supposed* to already be disallowing inlining of tm_pure
into non-tm_pure functions. At least that's what I remember...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2012-02-06 21:35:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 26593
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26593
another testcase but with an asm statement
the asm statement is in
