[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-03-24 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.5, 4.6.4, 4.7.1 Target Milestone|

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-07-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener 2012-12-11 09:59:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Any progress on this? Does the branch patch not work on the trunk? Simply task of forward-porting and testing.

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-11 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #19 from Jan Smets 2012-12-11 16:55:30 UTC --- Steven's example only contains 10 000 entries. I need to recompile a symbol table of 270.000 entries a dozen times each day. (and so do a lot of other people) With the 'fix' it st

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11 17:05:33 UTC --- Created attachment 28927 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28927 gcc48-pr52640.patch Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest on the trunk. No point to #inclu

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:43:39 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:43:33 2012 New Revision: 194441 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194441 Log: PR middle-end/52640 * varasm.c

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-09-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenth

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-09-07 Thread stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #16 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-09-07 19:07:27 UTC --- > Any progress on the "real" solution? If not, can you install the branch fix > on > trunk? Thx. I think I already mentioned before that the branch fix is the only r