http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-17
09:18:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 17 09:18:35 2012
New Revision: 191378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191378
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
18:25:52 UTC ---
I tend to agree; this isn't the only place in the middle-end this could cause
trouble. The handling of pow/powf in reassociation comes to mind as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
18:30:18 UTC ---
Seems the C++ FE ignores the nothrow attribute from builtins and instead just
uses its own cfns.gperf. pow is in there, but powf/powl is not (as C++03 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot
