http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #19 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18)
> Let's just reapply r192676 on the mainline. We just need to make sure that
> the failures on i686 don't reappear.
Done now less than half a year later!
(J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ---
> FWIW, I've bootstrapped and regtested gcc 4.9 with r192676 reapplied and the
> dse.c and cselib.c hunks of r193802 reverted on several hosts (x86_64,
> sparc64, powerpc64, armv5tel, m68k) without regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #16)
> FWIW, I've bootstrapped and regtested gcc 4.9 with r192676 reapplied and the
> dse.c and cselib.c hunks of r193802 reverted on several hosts (x86_64,
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-19
11:32:24 UTC ---
> Thanks for clarifying, I (think I) get it now. Not sure when I can revisit,
> maybe this month, maybe the next, so I won't feel bad if someone beats me to
> it.
Sure, no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2013-02-18
22:21:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The original patch was the patch you reverted in comment #1 and the fix for
> the
> original issue. As far as I can see, you didn't put it ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-18
10:48:18 UTC ---
> I've lost track. What was "the original patch", what do you mean by "the
> blockage patch" (that has been installed) and I'm pretty sure there were
> several follow-up patche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2013-02-17
00:33:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I'm getting back to this because I think that we should reinstate the original
> patch, now that the blockage patch has been installed.
*wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-16
09:44:31 UTC ---
While we are at it, we could also revert the dse.c and cselib.c hunks of the
blockage patch, which weren't strictly necessary. Jakub was really concerned
about their impact on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-27
11:54:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This patch broke bootstrap on s390x.
Please open a new PR, assigned to me, and attach preprocessed code.
Make it depend on this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-26
03:26:00 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Nov 26 03:25:57 2012
New Revision: 193803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193803
Log:
PR middle-end/55030
* gcc.dg/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-26
03:22:19 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Nov 26 03:22:15 2012
New Revision: 193802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193802
Log:
PR middle-end/55030
* builtin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
04:53:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 28664 [details]
> reduced test-case
Only intended for code inspection, not a self-contained test-case; that's
already cove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
04:37:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28664
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28664
reduced test-case
Reduced test-case. Do e.g. "cc1 -fpreprocessed pr55030-chk.i -quiet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-23
01:05:29 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Tue Oct 23 01:05:25 2012
New Revision: 192701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192701
Log:
PR middle-end/55030
Revert:
21 matches
Mail list logo
