http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #14 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-07 00:53:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> It appears that I need to provide the min length instead of the max
> length
> in the opaque condition.
It's more like, this is the o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-07 00:39:01 UTC ---
On 6-Nov-12, at 10:40 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I see now that you get INT_MAX substituted as the maximum length if
> the
> value is unknown.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #12 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-06 17:25:30 UTC ---
One way to get the maximum right would be to change genattrtab:max_attr_value
too process umax and/or smax, and use that to encapsulate the symbol_ref.
longer term,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #11 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-06 15:40:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The insn is actually a millicode call (branch) which needs to be able
> to reach stub table. Different variants are generated depending o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-06 12:26:06 UTC ---
On 5-Nov-12, at 11:20 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I take back that statement about this being straightforward. We
> need valid
> minimum and maxim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-04 16:59:07 UTC ---
I have done a -j2 bootstrap on gcc61, and in fails somewhere else in a similar
fashion. I then transplanted some files to my local (faster) cross
environment.
I've ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-04 02:52:31 UTC ---
On 3-Nov-12, at 4:45 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
>
> --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-03 20:45:10 UTC ---
Could you attach preprocessed source and the exact options passsed to cc1
(from -v --save-temos compilation) so that I can look at this in a cross
environment?
10 matches
Mail list logo
