https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-12-26 00:00:00 |2016-12-11
--- Comment #4 from Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-31
16:25:41 UTC ---
We do not sink loads aggressively.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-27
17:23:54 UTC ---
An even more pronounced test case, where we could sink
a lot more stores, which in fact could lead to moving
a whole loop:
logical function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
