[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

2013-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 12:48:28 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 15 12:48:13 2013 New Revision: 195194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195194 Log: 2013-01-15

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

2013-01-10 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 09:48:41 UTC --- I have bootstrapped and tested the patch from comment #11 on sparc64-linux (gcc63 on compile farm) and there were no issues (actually

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

2013-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

2013-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 11:26:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Or more correct Index: gcc/emit-rtl.c === ---

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

2013-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 11:35:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Eric, I am double-checking my patch and I believe all this 'bitpos' handling in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos (and/or