http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Dec 2 08:37:09 2013
New Revision: 205583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't create out-of-bounds BIT_FIELD_REF.
2013-11-27 Tom de Vrie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Nov 27 10:00:30 2013
New Revision: 205438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't create out-of-bounds BIT_FIELD_REF.
2013-11-27 Tom de Vrie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31286
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31286&action=edit
tentative patch
> I think it would be even better to fix whatever created that
> BIT_FIELD_REF, if you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> Tentative patch:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
> index 93b8970..6f2b4fb 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Matthew Leach from comment #1)
> Having a quick dig around the code, I think fold-const.c:16718 looks
> suspicious:
>
> if (offset/part_widthi <= TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (op00type))
>
> Likewise in c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
