[Bug middle-end/60726] [AArch64] pr40074.c regression after intrinsics a53 tuning

2014-04-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60726 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/60726] [AArch64] pr40074.c regression after intrinsics a53 tuning

2014-04-01 Thread yvan.roux at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60726 --- Comment #4 from Yvan Roux --- I just find the logs from the build farm, and it is indeed a qemu uncaught signal. Sorry for the false alert !

[Bug middle-end/60726] [AArch64] pr40074.c regression after intrinsics a53 tuning

2014-04-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60726 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Passes for me on a native aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu test run with r208953, which contains the tuning patches. Are you sure this is not an environment issue with a model or something?

[Bug middle-end/60726] [AArch64] pr40074.c regression after intrinsics a53 tuning

2014-04-01 Thread yvan.roux at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60726 --- Comment #2 from Yvan Roux --- I don't observe the regression in aarch64-none-elf on my side too. I'm looking for the configuration...

[Bug middle-end/60726] [AArch64] pr40074.c regression after intrinsics a53 tuning

2014-04-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60726 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org