[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-07-06 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #10 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org --- Yes. I see. The patch is in review. But no feedback although I had pinged it for three times. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01325.html I will go on ping it.

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-07-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-not test[lq] Still failing after revision r210921 (-m32 only).

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-26 Thread zqchen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #8 from zqchen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: zqchen Date: Mon May 26 06:11:33 2014 New Revision: 210921 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210921root=gccview=rev Log: ChangeLog: 2014-05-26 Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-20 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #3 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org --- I can not reproduce gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c fail with options -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -m32 -mtune=core2 What

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-20 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Even with the patch, I still get (using -m32 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-not test[lq]

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Even with the patch, I still get (using -m32 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-not test[lq] Confirmed, I have overlooked this failure.

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-20 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #7 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org --- Yes. gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c is still FAIL. I have not found an easy way to fix it. The root cause for the FAIL is that: A register copy is forwarded by copyprop_hardreg_forward called

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-19 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-19 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #2 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org --- Patch @r210457 enhances move_insn_for_shrink_wrap to sink more instructions out of entry block. For ICE, it tries to sink a SP adjustment instruction. But some useful information is lost