[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-14 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #35 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Feb 14 19:25:42 2017 New Revision: 245443 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245443=gcc=rev Log: PR target/79495 * config/i386/i386.md (*movxf_internal):

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-14 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #34 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Feb 14 17:54:01 2017 New Revision: 245442 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245442=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/61225 * gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c: Add

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #33 from Uroš Bizjak --- Looking at PR49095, it seems to me that the remaining of this PR is just a testsuite regression. PR49095 introduces various peephole2 patterns that generate RMW versions of x86 insns, and fshrink-wrap

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 > > Uroš Bizjak changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-11 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #30 from Segher Boessenkool --- Trying to combine the load+add+store, combine is trying insns like Failed to match this instruction: (parallel [ (set (mem:SI (reg/v/f:SI 90 [ x ]) [1 *x_5(D)+0 S4 A32]) (plus:SI

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-11 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #29 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Right. I think the test is xfailed, but I don't think the issue has been resolved. It requires some rethinking of how the combiner works IIRC.

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek --- Don't we still XFAIL the gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c test?

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2017-02-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT this PR seems fixed. Can I close it?

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2016-12-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2016-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2016-04-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |6.2 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek