https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
Revision r209530 is OK, r210534 is not, likely a wide-int fallout.
The problem first appeared in trunk revision 210113.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
notes that Dominique added to the dup:
Revision r209530 is OK, r210534 is not, likely a wide-int fallout.
(of course, it could be latent-revealed-by, but would be good for a wide-int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
