https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #7)
Richard, I am willing to debug this, but don't know where to go after the
above analysis.
I think it's a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 33367
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33367action=edit
Preprocessed and assembly files for gcc and clang
Preprocessed and assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Can you please investigate a bit yourself? The test relies on fork()/wait()
to work and properly return the exit status of the forked process.
Where should I start?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With a debugger?
Yerk!-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
If I remove the attribute 'no clone', the test succeeds with clang, but fails
with at least gcc 4.8.3, 4.9.1, and trunk.
