[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2015-02-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2015-02-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- As far as I know we're clean but on the XFAIL of g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C which was acked by Jason though.

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Bug 63790 depends on bug 64084, which changed state. Bug 64084 Summary: [5 Regression] match-and-simplify prefers complex matches https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-28 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Bug 63790 depends on bug 63862, which changed state. Bug 63862 Summary: C frontend converts shift-count to int while standard wants integer promotions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #10 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) But yes, adding -fno-ipa-icf to dg-options is fine with me (and pre-approved). I'm a bit worried that by manually

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- With -O2 -fno-ipa-icf, the expected error shows up. With only -O2, it does not. I attach the 088t.dom1 dump for both cases.

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34021 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34021action=edit dom1 dump with -O2

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34022 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34022action=edit dom1 dump with -O2 -fno-ipa-icf

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Interesting that IPA-ICF doesn't catch the opportunity on x86_64 ... Martin? IPA-ICF is badly broken on darwin.

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-16 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 --- Comment #2 from ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Nov 17 02:01:36 2014 New Revision: 217638 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217638root=gccview=rev Log: Always combine comparisons or conversions from booleans.

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

2014-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||xfail