https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sjölund ---
Thank you. I can confirm our compiler again bootstraps using gcc 5 branch using
-O2. Sadly, -O2 gives different behaviour than -O1, so I will need to
investigate and possibly file another bug report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Can't reproduce on (only slightly modified) trunk, might be latent there now.
Investigating on the branch instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest