https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
Bug 67034 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as base when optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Ok, it looks like that idea worked, at least on ppc64 and ppc64el; it's
available in the current git branch aoliva/pr64164. Would you please give it a
try on pa when you have a chance? Thanks in advance,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In case you haven't yet, don't bother. The fix is faulty; at least on ppc64le,
the copying doesn't work because it sets up the pseudo with the address of the
object only after the copying is done. I've go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-07-30, at 2:18 PM, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> John, if you can help with that, would you like
> the asm for this one testcase, or is it easy enough for you to give the branch
> a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
