[Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc

2015-11-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc

2015-10-27 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Was it fixed by the patch?

[Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc

2015-10-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc

2015-10-23 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri Oct 23 13:38:16 2015 New Revision: 229256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229256&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/68066 * tree.c (build_truth_vector

[Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc

2015-10-23 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Hmm, the boolean type shouldn't have precision 0. Ilya? Yep. I sent a patch to fix it. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg02298.html

[Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc

2015-10-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org Target M