https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
--- Comment #5 from Pekka S ---
It's true what you quoted, but on the other hand the current behaviour does not
produce code that will not fault -- it will indeed fault.
I see the rationale behind the packed attribute applied to a structure (say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
On x86_64 expansion is fine:
;; MEM[(volatile struct s0_t *)4B].y ={v} 1;
(insn 5 4 6 (set (reg/f:DI 89)
(const_int 4 [0x4])) "t.c":58 -1
(nil))
(insn 6 5 8 (set (reg:SI 90)
(mem/v/j:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-*-*
Priority|
