https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Adjusted testcase that fails also with -m64:
> struct A { unsigned char a[84]; };
> struct B { unsigned char b[216]; };
> struct C { union { struct A c; struct B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase that fails also with -m64:
struct A { unsigned char a[84]; };
struct B { unsigned char b[216]; };
struct C { union { struct A c; struct B d; }; };
struct D { unsigned char e[65536]; unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Erhm, but even that doesn't handle all anti-ranges properly; right below, we
state:
/* The bounds need not be ordered. Set HIB to use as the index
of the larger of the bounds and LOB as the opposit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
