https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Jan 31 21:55:45 2019
New Revision: 268431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-31 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Jan 31 17:14:36 2019
New Revision: 268425
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268425&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-31 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Jan 31 13:53:06 2019
New Revision: 268422
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268422&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-31 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/89008
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, fully agree -- I'll take care of that probably tomorrow. Too many
meetings this week...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 24 11:07:19 2019
New Revision: 268235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268235&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.4.1, 8.2.1
--- Comment #11 from Richa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Bill, you now need r268233 or earlier on the GCC 8 branch to reproduce the
latent issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 24 09:31:51 2019
New Revision: 268234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268234&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Created attachment 45506 [details]
> patch for the * 0 issue in reassoc
>
> I am testing a mitigation (and missed optimization fix) in reassoc. Bill,
> can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 23 14:02:13 2019
New Revision: 268186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/89008
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 45506
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45506&action=edit
patch for the * 0 issue in reassoc
I am testing a mitigation (and missed optimization fix) in reassoc. Bill,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Started with r236440 and was fixed with r263875.
Thanks Martin - this means both the * 0 added by reassoc and the SLSR issue
are latent.
Found * 0, removing all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r236440 and was fixed with r263875.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
16 matches
Mail list logo
