https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 2 12:56:24 2019
New Revision: 275317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275317=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-09-02 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-07-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 30 11:39:19 2019
New Revision: 275100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275100=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-30 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-08-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 31 15:40:36 2019
New Revision: 273939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273939=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-07-31 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-07-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #12 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
Created attachment 46591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46591=edit
Added more combinations of bitfield sets.
Now includes all 8 combinations of zero/non-zero assignments to 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #11 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Per Dalgas Jakobsen from comment #9)
> > avr-gcc -O3 (and -Os, -O1, -O2):
> > sts 0x0064, r1 ; 0x800064
> > ldi r24,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Per Dalgas Jakobsen from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > Fixed on trunk sofar.
> >
> > Note the non-optimal code-gen probably was a side-effect of us making
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #9 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Fixed on trunk sofar.
>
> Note the non-optimal code-gen probably was a side-effect of us making
> three volatile accesses out of one. On x86 I now see
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Known to fail|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 11 07:32:04 2019
New Revision: 273376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273376=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-07-11 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/91131
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #6 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> note your use of packed might end up doing more than one store depending
> on the architecture.
If you mean that a packed structure beyond the data-width
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #5 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So your complaint is that
>
> struct Reg_T {
> unsigned int a : 3;
> unsigned int b : 1;
> unsigned int c : 4;
> }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/gimplify.c
===
--- gcc/gimplify.c (revision 273355)
+++ gcc/gimplify.c (working copy)
@@ -5005,7 +5004,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #1 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
Created attachment 46585
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46585=edit
MWE: Preprocessed C-file
16 matches
Mail list logo
