https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 21 17:09:57 2019
New Revision: 278574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
David Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Then please attach the preprocessed source that still ICEs, together with
gcc/g++ command line that reproduces it. It doesn't have to be reduced, we can
do that ourselves.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #15 from David Seifert ---
Created attachment 47887
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47887&action=edit
preprocessed_example.c.gz
Running GCC 9.2 with
gcc-9.2.0 -msse4.1 -O3 -c preprocessed_example.c -o foo.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #16 from David Seifert ---
(In reply to David Seifert from comment #15)
> Created attachment 47887 [details]
> preprocessed_example.c.gz
>
> Running GCC 9.2 with
>
> gcc-9.2.0 -msse4.1 -O3 -c preprocessed_example.c -o foo.o
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #18 from David Seifert ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
> Can't reproduce, compiles without any ICE since the above mentioned commits.
> In #c15 you are clearing testing with GCC 9.2.0, but that is expected, the
> bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #19 from David Seifert ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
> Can't reproduce, compiles without any ICE since the above mentioned commits.
> In #c15 you are clearing testing with GCC 9.2.0, but that is expected, the
> bug