https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92628
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Any progress in this direction? Should we revisit PR 67202
(maybe do this in trans-*), or maybe even it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92628
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
*** Bug 49733 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92628
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> A similar rule applies to other variables in Fortran
See also PR 60712 regarding restrict and local variables (as opposed to
PARAM_DECL) for a simpler case (no fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92628
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||49774
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92628
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I think we have a duplicate asking about restrict to have an effect on
> function calls.
Could be PR tree-optimization/81008.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92628
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
