[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.4

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Hmm, but this destructive modification of something we don't unshare doesn't > work. Either we have to always wrap statement lists but then we're back to > the

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 > > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > Could we make those sepcifc DEBUG_STMTS appear only later (during > gimplification maybe?) and represent them as expression flags in the > FEs? That would av

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Tried: --- gcc/gimplify.c.jj 2020-02-09 08:16:19.399581468 +0100 +++ gcc/gimplify.c 2020-02-25 13:46:51.166409528 +0100 @@ -886,7 +886,29 @@ mostly_copy_tree_r (tree *tp, int *walk_ /* Cope with th

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48133&action=edit gcc10-pr93786.patch Untested fix.

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Tried now also: --- gcc/gimplify.c.jj 2020-04-19 12:10:35.700627184 +0200 +++ gcc/gimplify.c 2020-04-21 12:24:41.444307978 +0200 @@ -886,7 +886,11 @@ mostly_copy_tree_r (tree *tp, int *walk_ /* Cop