https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94992
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
For completeness, this is a reduction of a std::swap(x,x). The placement new
was originally in the move assignment operator.
I was able to reproduce this with gcc 9 by moving a few functions out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94992
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Comment on attachment 48477
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48477
testcase
>my_future f2;
>new (&f2) my_future(std::move(f2));
This is going to be problematic as f2 is being cre
