[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-07-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|10.3 --- Comment #12 from Richard

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-18 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for GCC 11.

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:266f44a91c0c9705d3d18e82d7c5bab32927a18f commit r11-446-g266f44a91c0c9705d3d18e82d7c5bab32927a18f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun May 17

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > On Tue, 12 May 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 > > > > --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- > > The

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com URL|

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-12 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 12 May 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 > > --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- > The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- STV generates: 8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea0x0(%esi),%esi a1 00 00 00 00 mov0x0,%eax R_386_32target_p 83 ec 08sub$0x8,%esp f3 0f 7e 00

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has /* If the def is to only part of the reg, it does not kill the other defs that reach here. */ if (!(DF_REF_FLAGS (def) & (DF_REF_PARTIAL

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- 271r.ce2 dump has ;; bb 0 artificial_defs: { d2(0){ }d5(1){ }d8(2){ }d9(6){ }d17(7){ }d34(16){ }d44(19){ }d47(20){ }d50(21){ }d53(22){ }d66(28){ }d69(29){ }d72(30){ }} ;; bb 0 artificial_uses: { } ;; lr in

[Bug middle-end/95021] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wclobbered warning

2020-05-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|