[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69165332a914f1167c3077fa1f57afc64fd8a667 commit r11-6271-g69165332a914f1167c3077fa1f57afc64fd8a667 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 49799 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49799=edit gcc11-pr98366.patch Untested fix.

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- But struct S { int b; int alignment; int c : 7; int d : 8; int e : 17; } const e[] = {{0, 3, '(', 2, 0}}; typedef struct S S; int memcmp (const void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__); int main () {

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-18 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The question be asked if (S[]){{.alignment = 3, '(', 2.0}} has a defined S[0].b to be 0 or is uninitialized?

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Seems like since that revision we completely elide the memcmp check.

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

2020-12-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|