https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #3)
> Thanks for the additional information, indeed in our CI we do not run
> validations for several "variations", so it's not surprising this case is
> not handled ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
Thanks for the additional information, indeed in our CI we do not run
validations for several "variations", so it's not surprising this case is not
handled very well.
So you suggest having one manifest pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #1)
> Hello Sam,
>
> I mostly work with the GDB testsuite, so I'm not very familiar with
> GCC-specific details of DejaGNU and the sum files, so advance warning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
