--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
10:50 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00665.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-10 07:32 ---
These PCH problems does not occur on the current 3.4 branch:
See test results at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00353.html
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
13:52 ---
Does large test fail with 3.4.x, if so then this is not really a regression
except for PCH size.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 18:05 ---
well, I can't find the large test in the c++ pch testsuite. And, from the test
results posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00244.html
I can't tell if the largefile test in
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:23 ---
oh, the last one was run with gcc cvs trunk LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jan 6 20:22:33
UTC 2005
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:21 ---
This is what I find about largefile in the c testsuite:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O0 -g -o largefile.h.gch
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
20:39 ---
Some information.
It failed since at least 2004-05-12:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-05/msg00747.html
But it passed on 2004-04-28:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-05/msg00073.html
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
20:51 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Some information.
One more note this is not related to the tree-ssa merge because that happened
on the 13th.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
20:53 ---
It was broken on the 2nd:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-05/msg00231.html
Now someone has to figure out which patch broke it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
20:55 ---
Hmm but according to earlier results in April it was broken before then:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg01175.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
10 matches
Mail list logo
