[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21398

[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-05 13:49 --- "`a', b, c, or d register for the i386. For x86-64 it is equivalent to `r' class (for 8-bit instructions that do not use upper halves). " -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21398

[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-05 14:22 --- in online docs i see that "q" means "byte addressable register (a,b,c,d)". in i386.h i see something differ for x86_64. did i miss something in docs? #define REG_CLASS_FROM_LETTER(C)\ ((C) == 'r'

[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-05 14:24 --- (In reply to comment #2) > in online docs i see that "q" means "byte addressable register (a,b,c,d)". > in i386.h i see something differ for x86_64. did i miss something in docs? Yes see comment #1 which

[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-05 14:41 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > in online docs i see that "q" means "byte addressable register (a,b,c,d)". > > in i386.h i see something differ for x86_64. did i miss something in doc