--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 17:45 ---
The link in comment #5 is to David Edelsohn's message that RMS had approved the
license change. Ben Elliston changed the license in the decNumber files for
mainline and the 4.2 branch.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 23:38 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00481.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28002
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-16 01:30 ---
I was wrong in comment #3, config/dfp-bit.[ch] correctly use GPL plus
exception.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28002
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 21:41 ---
RMS declined to relicense the decNumber source files.
We've got the same problem with config/dfp-bit.[ch], which were new files added
by GCC developers from IBM, and a couple of other minor files in libdecnumber/.
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 16:31 ---
David is pursuing this as part of a larger effort to fix licenses for GCC
libraries. David, any news?
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-03 07:20 ---
Confirmed, any news on this?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
