[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-05 Thread mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #9 from Blanca Mancilla 2011-04-06 00:50:09 UTC --- Yeap! The problem was the libraries not found and the make install assumming make run without error. I had a conflict between the ubuntu c++ and 4.7 in some other program and while t

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-05 14:55:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > `/home/mancilla/current/soft/src/gcc-build-latest/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc': > configu

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-05 14:51:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > > `/home/mancilla/current/soft/src/gcc-build-latest/x86_64-unkno

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-05 11:06:23 UTC --- Would be interesting to know why fixincludes is not built. Can you try to track that down?

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-04 Thread mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |other Severity

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-05 03:48:39 UTC --- Oh and using a relative path to configure is not fully supported either even though it has worked a lot more reliable than building in the source directory. Try doing: `pwd`/../gcc-sv

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-04 Thread mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #2 from mancilla at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-04-05 03:44:59 UTC --- No, I'm building in a separate build directory. Below is my build sequence. #!/bin/sh echo Updating the s

[Bug other/48445] Release does not generate fixincludes directory needed by Makefile

2011-04-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-05 03:38:14 UTC --- Are you building inside the source directly? If so that is not really supported.