https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #12 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11)
> Do you have a reproducer you can share?
>
> I'll happily reopen the PR then, of course!
After 6 years, no I don't.
You could use the test case include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Do you have a reproducer you can share?
I'll happily reopen the PR then, of course!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #10 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
To be clear, this is still a bug for powerpc(SPE or no SPE) and possibly any
other arch using fixup tables like ppc.
One can workaround this bug by using the -fno-ira-hoist-pressure, I am not
sure why th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #9 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> It does not happen on any target currently, and it has never happened
> on non-SPE targets before.
The main user, u-boot, added the workaround with -fno-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It does not happen on any target currently, and it has never happened
on non-SPE targets before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #7 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> The powerpcspe backend has been deprecated in GCC 8 and removed during GCC 9
> development. See corresponding mailing list threads[1,2,3] for details.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #5 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se ---
I am sure I saw .data.rel.ro.local section with a .4byte statement in it
using -S
Now I cannot repeat it. The only thing that has changed that I know is
glibc 2.19 is no glibc 2.20 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
I meant by my testcase comment that gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr60158.c
is a poor test because it does not seem to emit addresses to .data.rel.ro.local
or any other non-got section, on gcc-4.9, gcc-5 or m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #3 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> Fixed on master with git commit 8e2a42caa / svn rev 223209.
> Fixed for gcc-4.9 with git commit 110222ca0 / svn rev 223714.
> Fixed for gcc-4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Fixed on master with git commit 8e2a42caa / svn rev 223209.
Fixed for gcc-4.9 with git commit 110222ca0 / svn rev 223714.
Fixed for gcc-4.8 with git commit 071358356 / svn rev 223713.
Oddly, not backported to g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joakim.tjernlund@
12 matches
Mail list logo