https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #29 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #28)
> And is there already a bugzilla bug about these (or should I create one)?
Done. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113528
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #27)
> The original article checked gcc-10.
> gcc-13 is checked in the following article:
>
> https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1067/
>
> I suspect it would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #27 from David Binderman ---
The original article checked gcc-10.
gcc-13 is checked in the following article:
https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1067/
I suspect it would be most unwise if any release of gcc after 13
introduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #24 from Leo Yuriev ---
So, seems that all done and this issue should be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> (In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> > > or if instead we should drop the "status = " for the cases w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Stubbs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:966de09be91c639d66d252c9ae6ab8da5ebfca18
commit r10-7912-g966de09be91c639d66d252c9ae6ab8da5ebfca18
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Frederik Harwath :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15256c8a8ac6573d250506c40dbe13082186c2aa
commit r10-7845-g15256c8a8ac6573d250506c40dbe13082186c2aa
Author: Frederik Harwath
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frederik at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #19 from Leo Yuriev ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a64468a3034dd8e2d0794a5be84b8da544ffe2c3
>
> commit r10-7770-ga64468a3034dd8e2d0794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
The code in ipa_polymorphic_call_context::set_by_invariant seems fishy. It's
there since the beginning: r5-3634-g6f8091fc3ed9d3cfa7a6dee7e9f9a34eb4308b2a.
@Honza: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> There is also this one from cppcheck:
>
> trunk.git/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/formatter.h:302:40: warning: Redundant
> assignment of '_M_variant._M_iterat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2c0fa35d0dc8912b0c1a658234221de61e60840
commit r10-7806-ga2c0fa35d0dc8912b0c1a658234221de61e60840
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman ---
There is also this one from cppcheck:
trunk.git/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/formatter.h:302:40: warning: Redundant
assignment of '_M_variant._M_iterator._M_constness' to itself. [selfAssignment]
Source co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e3897490e0f99b22a2813cfb34d59a1ea71ff68
commit r10-7774-g2e3897490e0f99b22a2813cfb34d59a1ea71ff68
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> > or if instead we should drop the "status = " for the cases where nothing
> > checks it. Andrew?
>
> I think ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> or if instead we should drop the "status = " for the cases where nothing
> checks it. Andrew?
I think checking the status is probably good practice, even thoug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 48299
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48299
sorted list of redundant assignments
/* If there were any declarations or structure tags in that level,
or if thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 48299
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48299&action=edit
sorted list of redundant assignments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > We should for GCC11 discuss if we want to implement some of these checks,
> > either in -fanalyzer, or as normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a64468a3034dd8e2d0794a5be84b8da544ffe2c3
commit r10-7770-ga64468a3034dd8e2d0794a5be84b8da544ffe2c3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 48298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48298&action=edit
parts I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Picking those obvious to me at the moment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
31 matches
Mail list logo
