[Bug pending/19514] bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef

2005-01-18 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-18 22:20 --- Subject: Re: New: bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: When compiling the following two lines: typedef double R;

[Bug pending/19514] bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef

2005-01-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18 22:52 --- Invalid based on JSM's comment. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug pending/19514] bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef

2005-01-18 Thread stevenj at fftw dot org
--- Additional Comments From stevenj at fftw dot org 2005-01-18 22:56 --- Subject: Re: bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: typedef double R; typedef R _Complex C; This is not valid code; you can't use

[Bug pending/19514] bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef

2005-01-18 Thread stevenj at fftw dot org
--- Additional Comments From stevenj at fftw dot org 2005-01-18 23:15 --- Subject: Re: bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef Okay, I guess I see what you mean. double in double _Complex is arguably not a type, but rather a type-specifier as defined in 6.7.2, and

[Bug pending/19514] bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef

2005-01-18 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-18 23:52 --- Subject: Re: bogus warning about complex integer types from typedef On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, stevenj at fftw dot org wrote: Okay, I guess I see what you mean. double in double _Complex is arguably not a