https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767
--- Comment #5 from Alexey Izbyshev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Is there a public specification of the Microsoft extension and how it is
> supposed to behave with recursion or is the recursion behavior specified
> by the C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767
--- Comment #3 from Alexey Izbyshev ---
> I can make newer one recognize _Pragma only by unquoting the string literal
I've investigated this strange behavior because MSVC docs do claim that C99
_Pragma is properly supported[1].
It turned out th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Izbyshev ---
Old MSVC doesn't support _Pragma, and I can make newer one recognize _Pragma
only by unquoting the string literal, so the first test case becomes:
// Removed stringizing in _Pragma
#define P(x) _Pragma(x)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
How does msvc handle this? Since gcc is trying to be compatible with msvc here.
