https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
r239175 seemed to fix it: "On-demand locations within string-literals"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-29 19:48 ---
The infinite loop is still present in GCC 4.3 with
#define A(b) #b
A(\ \\)
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from sabre at nondot dot org 2006-07-15 05:26 ---
Okay, I don't care who does or doesn't do it. :) It doesn't get diagnosed in
-E mode, though it's in clear violation of C99 6.10.3.2p2.
-Chris
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 05:25 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Right, but that is presumably the parser, not the preprocessor doing it... so
> it is a bug in the preprocessor.
Nope, that is the preprocessor doing it, you will notice the column field w
--- Comment #3 from sabre at nondot dot org 2006-07-15 05:23 ---
> Also without -E, we do warn about the second one:
> t.c:2:7: warning: unknown escape sequence '\`'
Right, but that is presumably the parser, not the preprocessor doing it... so
it is a bug in the preprocessor.
-Chris
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 05:21 ---
Also without -E, we do warn about the second one:
t.c:2:7: warning: unknown escape sequence '\`'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 05:21 ---
Well it is even worse than that, with the first one, we go into an infinite
loop when you don't use -E.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
