--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30786
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Oct 31 14:50:13 2007
New Revision: 129800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129800
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR preprocessor/30786:
* gcc.dg/c
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to fail||3
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30786
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-04-16 20:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13372)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13372&action=view)
patch to fix part of the bug
This patch seems to fix the preprocessor side of the bug. However there are
problems late
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-04-16 20:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=13373)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13373&action=view)
patch to fix part of the bug
By fixing the preprocessor part better, we can fix the bug completely.
However, I don't h
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Keywords||error-recovery
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-19 16:13 ---
I'm testing this patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-19 18:19 ---
A program like '_Pragma /*comment*/' still gives an ICE.
I'm testing an updated patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30786
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-19 18:54 ---
What does a plain "_Pragma" mean?
Currently we try to give an error for this. However, it is not clear that
this is actually erroneous. The copy of the standard that I am reading
only mentions:
A unary operator exp
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 18:42 ---
FYI -- I talked to Neil and he was of the opinion that non-matching
_Pragma forms were undefined. So, I think it is best if GCC chooses
to continue giving an error in these situations.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
10 matches
Mail list logo
