[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2017-07-26 Thread postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 --- Comment #10 from postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 41841 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41841=edit attachment-54311-1.eml

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2017-07-26 Thread postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 --- Comment #9 from postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net --- [IMAGE] There was a problem delivering your email to: alf.la...@aiscientific.com - WHAT

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2017-07-26 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2017-07-26 Thread postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 --- Comment #7 from postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net --- [IMAGE] There was a problem delivering your email to: alf.la...@aiscientific.com - WHAT

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2017-07-26 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED CC|

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2008-05-23 Thread andrew_dowden at softdesign dot net dot nz
--- Comment #5 from andrew_dowden at softdesign dot net dot nz 2008-05-23 22:53 --- Strongly agree, can not change existing use/std. as relates to C89/C90 etc. Would also suggest (as minor alternative): __DATEI__ date index-order, numeric, sort friendly; also US-military, etc..

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2007-06-12 Thread alf dot lacis at aiscientific dot com
--- Comment #4 from alf dot lacis at aiscientific dot com 2007-06-12 23:33 --- I did *not* say I wanted a new format for __DATE__ __TIME__ (reread my request). I wanted *new* macros. For example: Macro: Expands to: ___MM_DD__ 2007-02-20 also know as 'Swedish format'

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2007-04-25 Thread eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com
--- Comment #3 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-04-25 18:04 --- Note that the -MM-DD date format is ISO standard 8601, which also includes formats for time as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 Any new formats for __DATE__ and __TIME__ should probably

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2007-04-24 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 01:22 --- I agree that the swedish (never heard it called that before) format is superior. But what is the use case for having this available as a preprocessor macro? -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug preprocessor/30867] Can we have a new __DATE__ which is sortable, eg YYYY-MM-DD

2007-02-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 05:54 --- You should note that __DATE__ and __TIME__ are actually part of the C89 (ANSI) and C90 (ISO) standards. This is probably a question for the steering committee Really if you up to implementing it, I would say go