http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz 2010-09-29 18:18:42
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Sep 29 18:18:38 2010
New Revision: 164729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164729
Log:
2010-09-29 Kai Tietz
PR preprocessor/45362
--- Comment #17 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 01:14 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Created an attachment (id=21820)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820&action=view) [edit]
> > testcase for problem
> >
> > As this test need m
--- Comment #16 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 01:04 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Created an attachment (id=21820)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820&action=view) [edit]
> > testcase for problem
> >
> > As this test need m
--- Comment #15 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 18:37 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Created an attachment (id=21820)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820&action=view) [edit]
> testcase for problem
>
> As this test need more then on header, please ext
--- Comment #14 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 14:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=21820)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820&action=view)
testcase for problem
As this test need more then on header, please extract it and compile then
main.c to reprod
--- Comment #13 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-16 22:33 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Can you try compiling it with
> --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
> ? Perhaps you'll trigger it then more reliably...
>
Without it:
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 22:28 ---
Can you try compiling it with
--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
? Perhaps you'll trigger it then more reliably...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362
--- Comment #11 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-16 22:06 ---
But too bad this file 'gtype-desc.c' is automatically generated at build time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362
--- Comment #10 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-16 22:03 ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
gt_ggc_mx_cpp_macro (x_p=) at gtype-desc.c:2078
2078 ((*x).params[i0]) ? HT_IDENT_TO_GCC_IDENT (HT_NODE
(((*x).params[i0]))) : NULL;
(gdb) bt
#0 gt_ggc
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 22:00 ---
GC issues normally don't show at different times depending on the layout of
memory and such. Sometimes it depends on env variables being slightly
different.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, GC, ice-on-valid-code
Summary|Dangling reference ab
12 matches
Mail list logo