[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-29 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362 --- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-29 18:18:42 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Sep 29 18:18:38 2010 New Revision: 164729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164729 Log: 2010-09-29 Kai Tietz

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-29 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-17 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 14:01 --- Created an attachment (id=21820) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820action=view) testcase for problem As this test need more then on header, please extract it and compile then main.c to

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-17 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 18:37 --- (In reply to comment #14) Created an attachment (id=21820) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820action=view) [edit] testcase for problem As this test need more then on header, please extract

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-17 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 01:04 --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Created an attachment (id=21820) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820action=view) [edit] testcase for problem As this test need more then

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-17 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 01:14 --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Created an attachment (id=21820) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21820action=view) [edit] testcase for problem As this test need more then

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, GC, ice-on-valid-code Summary|Dangling reference

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 22:00 --- GC issues normally don't show at different times depending on the layout of memory and such. Sometimes it depends on env variables being slightly different. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-16 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-16 22:03 --- Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. gt_ggc_mx_cpp_macro (x_p=value optimized out) at gtype-desc.c:2078 2078 ((*x).params[i0]) ? HT_IDENT_TO_GCC_IDENT (HT_NODE (((*x).params[i0]))) : NULL;

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-16 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-16 22:06 --- But too bad this file 'gtype-desc.c' is automatically generated at build time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 22:28 --- Can you try compiling it with --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0 ? Perhaps you'll trigger it then more reliably... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45362

[Bug preprocessor/45362] [4.6 Regression] Dangling reference about saved cpp_macro for push/pop macro

2010-09-16 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-16 22:33 --- (In reply to comment #12) Can you try compiling it with --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0 ? Perhaps you'll trigger it then more reliably... Without it: GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30