https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #2 from Cameron Tacklind cameron at tacklind dot com ---
Ah, I had not seen a reference to the -std making a difference. You are right
that adding -std=c99 removes the extra define.
Of note, I'm finding it difficult to find where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/cpp/System-specific-Predefined-Macros.html#System-specific-Predefined-Macros
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/cpp/System-specific-Predefined-
Macros.html#System-specific-Predefined-Macros
When the -ansi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #5 from Cameron Tacklind cameron at tacklind dot com ---
Pardon my brevity. Yes, I'd seen that.
I was trying to comment on this list seemingly missing a reference to that
particular difference. Or that if it is listed, it is
